Posts Tagged ‘48 laws of power’

That Neverending Theory about that @#$ Free Lunch! (law 40)

Monday, September 28th, 2009

lunchDespise the Free Lunch. This is Greene’s recommendation in his fortieth law in The 48 Laws of Power.

What? Hey! That’s not fair! Free is good! Free is great! Say all of us.

“What is free is dangerous,” he says. He says free things usually involve a trick or some hidden obligation. Even if there is no hidden charge, you could end up saddled with gratitude or guilt. He suggests that instead of cutting corners, you pay full price. He suggests that you be lavish with your money and keep it circulating.

I think he definitely has a point, but modern times have definitely changed the dynamic of free stuff. Online, people are used to getting stuff for free. In fact, it has become a thorn in the side of business that people now expect a certain amount of stuff for free. And it has also become a business strategy: give away something (usually information) for free and people will see that your product is a good one. They’ll then buy the supplementary product. It works for millions of online retailers, and it often doesn’t include any hidden obligations.

What it does do is plant that brand in your head, impress you with that brand’s particular quality, and maybe, just maybe, create a little brand loyalty. Is this a price that you pay? Is there anything wrong with this? Not necessarily, no. So modern times have created a way for free stuff to be just plain free. Largely because it’s so easy to disseminate information online.

But there are still plenty of situations where “you’ve won a free trip!” is nothing but a sign of a scam in the making. So, the advice, generally speaking, does hold. Now, Greene’s exhortation to be lavish with your money is interesting. It’s a good theory, but if I sit down right now and buy a thousand bucks worth of stuff on Ebay, I guarantee that is not going to bring me anything except a bunch of stuff. It’s not going to bring me wealth and it’s not going to impress people. So, is it really wise to be lavish instead of frugal?

To be honest, I didn’t tell you his entire statement, which is, “Be lavish with your money and keep it circulating, for generosity is a sign and a magnet for power.” Oh! So if you’re generous in front of others, then it will lead to power? Exactly. If you’re generous TO others, it will also lead to power. Generosity is a social phenomenon. Except for chat rooms, and then only in a limited way, the internet is cut off from society. Buying stuff online to use alone in my home will not contribute to my power or raise my esteem in the eyes of others. In the same way, if I were to jet to New York tonight, stay long enough to buy myself twenty lavish five-star dinners, then come home, it would not contribute to my power (only my waistline), because I didn’t involve anyone I know. But when you are seen being generous, when you involve others in your spending, when you are observed living with a carefree attitude to money, like a wealthy person does, it does raise your esteem in the eyes of others, and contributes to your power.

Stir Up the Mud While Remaining Placid (law 39)

Saturday, September 26th, 2009

UpsetWoman-main_FullLaw 39 in Greene’s 48 Laws of Power is “Stir up Waters to Catch Fish.” It refers to emotional waters. If you can get people in an emotionally volatile state, it’ll be counterproductive for them, but something you can take advantage of. Make your enemies angry while staying calm yourself, and you gain an advantage. Or make your enemies (or customers) feel greedy, vain, worried, or paranoid, and you can exploit that emotional weakness as well.

How many politicians have built up the fear of terrorism, communism, nuclear war, environmental catastrophe, or a million other things to incite their constituents to action? How many votes have been cast out of outright fear created by the politicians themselves? Meanwhile, society is actually blundering along in its usual way, in no more danger than it ever was, except for the danger created by the fear of danger itself.

Women (men too) fall victim to this strategy in advertising: they take on the fear of not being beautiful. They buy cosmetics, plastic surgery, clothing, and hundreds of other products because of this fear. This isn’t to say that women wouldn’t but those things anyway, but buying out of an honest desire is different than buying out of a desire created by a fear of its opposite.

Adolescents are particularly vulnerable to law 39. It’s so easy to stir up their emotions. And when you do, you can sell them anything. But of course, the game gets more difficult when your audience becomes more sophisticated. It becomes more difficult to find their weak spots and get them off balance. But if you do your research, keep your spies active, and stay focused, you can find that chink in their armor. That’s when you dig deep and get them upset. Now you hold the power. But only if you don’t break and succumb to emotion too.

But it’s sad, I think. So much of society is based entirely on law 39. Every advertisement you see is designed to stir some emotion, to manipulate your fears and desires. Everything on television is designed to get us worked up. Every movie is nothing but an exercise in getting our emotions manipulated. Staying neutral is key to avoiding this manipulation . . . but what’s the fun in that?

We all want to experience emotion, after all. Thrills, excitement, outrage, happiness, love—this stuff makes the world go around. A robot has power over emotional people, but it’s still a robot after all. So you want to enjoy emotional moments when you aren’t in danger, that’s all—danger of being taken advantage of in a business setting, danger of being influenced to make a wrong decision politically, danger of buying something you don’t need. In those situations, you have to turn into a robot. You are Spock. Can you do it? Few can, but power belongs to the few, so good luck.

Go Ahead, Make a Spectacle of Yourself (law 37)

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

spectacleLaw #37 in Greene’s the 48 Laws of Power states that you should create compelling spectacles. Now, the examples he gives are somewhat archaic, for instance—a Dr. Weisleder, from Berlin, who claimed to cure patients by exposing them to the rays of the moon. It was quite a ceremony, quite a spectacle indeed. Of course, it was bunk, but he had a huge following just because it appealed to peoples’ emotions. Would that work today? Well, to be honest it probably would. There are still all kinds of medical charlatans out there, claiming that all kinds of esoteric approaches work. And there isn’t exactly any way to disprove them or prove them, so that keeps it delightfully vague.  That’s the key to the whole spectacle idea. People want an immediate appeal to their emotions. Forget about science. Color, sound, ceremony, and pomp provide that.

Green also gives the example of Diane de Poitiers, King Henri II’s mistress. The thing was, she was 20 years older than he, so she was worried he’d drop her and leave her destitute. Well, she started going around using elaborate symbols about herself that implying a connection with the Roman goddess Diana. It had a twofold effect: it gave her whole persona an aura of romance and grandeur, and it served to advertise her association with the king. It worked. In modern parlance, this would fall under the concept of branding. Basically, she created a brand around herself. She became Abercrombie or Hollister. She made herself into a commodity that everyone wanted, not because of anything having to do with herself, but because her brand became popular and people wanted to be associated with it.

Spectacle can work the way de Poitiers used it- as an everyday assault on the senses that creates visual familiarity. It becomes an aesthetic place holder in society. You are so used to seeing people walk around with shirts that say “Holister” that you don’t even question it anymore. You don’t think of it as a spectacle, but it certainly is one. After all, most brands restrict themselves to small tags and emblems on clothing, they don’t dare to splash themselves across the wearer’s chests, do they? It’s a bold, spectacular move.

Spectacle can also work the way Dr. Wiesleder used it. Even if his cure had been a legitimate one, it would still have been a benefit to have so much ceremony associated with it. The unusual hours, the unusual circumstances, and the wackiness of it all really drew attention to the cure. After all, people can’t get as excited by some new pill to swallow as they can by a fascinating ritual they need to perform. In today’s world, make the ritual scientifically based, offer some kind of statistics and proof to back it up, and it’ll attract plenty of interest. This is how many cults and religions attract members—there is always plenty of spectacle. Regardless of their attraction to the divine, worshippers get a lot of emotional fulfillment from rituals and visual grandeur.

So whatever your product, especially if the product is you and your services, branding it and creating a ritual, a mystique, around the delivery of that product can be key to success.

Diarrhea of the Mouth? Yeah, Me too. (law 30)

Saturday, September 5th, 2009

shWe’re getting well up into the second half of The 48 Laws of Power. Law thirty begins summing up the previous laws by stating “make your accomplishments seem effortless.”  Basically, it means you have got to pay attention to all the laws, but for heaven’s sakes don’t let anyone know you read this book!

Everything you do should seem natural, unstudied, and executed with ease. Whatever clever tricks, underhanded maneuvers, or back-room deals led you to your current place must never come to the surface. Never reveal how hard you work. Never teach anyone your tricks, or they will be used against you.

What a lonely life.

I’m serious.

Sure, you don’t want to tell everyone your secrets, but you have to tell someone. I mean, that’s the fun of it. You actually succeed, or think you might succeed, or starting getting your mojo working, and you want to tell someone how you did it! Do it! But tell someone who can understand. Not someone with no imagination. They’ll only discourage you.

Me, I can never resist telling everyone everything. I keep hoping it’ll add to my charm or something. I keep hoping that it’s some secret strategy for success that I’m doing intuitively. I know its just diarrhea of the mouth, but I keep on hoping. That said, here are some tips for making your work not just look effortless, but be more effortless by just pacing yourself logically:

First: Don’t compare your pace of work to your coworkers’. You have to develop the pace that is appropriate for you and stick with it. While others may seem to be whipping through the work, they are probably not pacing themselves, and will burn out. As in law #29, be aware of the endpoint. Know how much you have to do in what amount of time. Try to determine how long it takes to do each item, and then stick with that pace. If your schedule demands that you do the impossible, reschedule. Running yourself ragged will make you look stressed out. Not smooth!

Second: Don’t procrastinate. Sometimes that means just don’t stop and think. Schedule the work you have to do each day and get to work. Reconsidering your schedule once its made will delay your work as well as make you seem indecisive and confused. To appear effortless, don’t second-guess yourself.

Third: Do your best but don’t be a perfectionist. Don’t compare your work to others’. Perfection is not only hard to define, it’s hard to achieve, and everyone has their own standards. You may think your work is not precise enough, while others value your creativity. Or you may find your work too finicky, while others admire your technical know-how. When you do your personal best, that means you are being yourself. Your personality is ultimately your key to success, so don’t suppress!

Make Yourself Scarce (law 16)

Friday, August 14th, 2009

hiding“Use Absence to Increase Respect and Honor,” that’s law number 16 in Greene’s book, The 48 Laws of Power. It is also stated as “too much circulation makes the price go down.” (No relation to “too much light makes the baby go blind.”) Basic law of supply and demand, applied to your actual person, rather than a product.

I think this is really true, but it’s a fine line you have to walk. You have to first establish yourself in some group—be it social, work, educational, or whatever. Then temporarily withdraw from it. People will wonder where you are. Do you have more important things to do? Have you suddenly become rich and now spend your time in the south of France? Are you in great demand all over town? This really does work to create a sort of fascination around you. But beware! If someone more fascinating comes along and takes your place, interest about you could wane. You run the risk of being replaced!

I worked at this law office in New York City. All the paralegals there were a bunch of slackers. They played computer games all day, it was pathetic. But we were a kind of adjunct office. The real office was across the street, and that’s where all the management types were. So we got to know each other pretty well and horsed around a lot. We’d invite each other to parties, art openings, plays. It was a bunch of artists with day jobs, basically.

So there was this guy named Brian, and he was very social. His name was actually Brian Adams, like the singer, so that was funny. Made him unforgettable, which he loved. He was the type that wanted to be the life of every party, be super popular, and show off about it. Now, whenever he was invited to a party, he would show up just when the action was getting good and leave early. He never stayed long.

Brian freely explained why he did this because he was so proud of having discovered such an effective strategy. He explained that it created the illusion that he had so many parties to go to every night that he just couldn’t stay long at any one of them. It made him look busy busy busy and also created that element of scarcity. I think sometimes he’d spend the rest of the night alone in his apartment, but he never ever broke his rule of no more than an hour and a half at any party.head01

It worked. He was a fun guy, so we all anticipated when he would show up. He was also kind of obnoxious, so it was smart that he never stayed long enough to outwear his welcome. And even though we knew it was a ploy, there was still this lingering feeling that yes, Brian did have a lot of other parties to go to, plays to direct, actors to schmooze with, checks to deposit in Swiss bank accounts. There was always that lingering feeling.

Now you might think that the fact that he revealed his strategy to us would detract from the effectiveness of the strategy itself, but it actually didn’t. Because he was such a partier and such a goofy guy, the partying rule created this other dimension to his personality. It let us know that there was a serious schemer, maybe even a businessman, under that clownish exterior. We believed that he would go far.

I don’t know what he is up to now, but Brian definitely taught me the value of Rule #16, “use absence to increase respect.”

Crush Your Enemy (law 15)

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

conanWe are up to Law 15 in Greene’s the 48 laws of power. It states that you should “crush your enemy totally.” I completely agree. It states that if one ember of his fire is left alight, no matter how dimly it smolders, a fire will eventually break out. The enemy will recover and seek revenge. They really will.

Because folks, nothing sucks more than a half-way job. If you can find a win/win situation with people, that’s best. That way nobody has to be an enemy. But if you have to go out there and vanquish someone, you better not leave them any room for revenge. Because they will surely seek it.

Here’s the story: I was in college and living with my boyfriend in a small two-bedroom apartment on this amazing couple acres of land. There were three apartments there in all. We loved it. I mean it was gorgeous, and we did all the upkeep as part of our rent. The woman who rented the place out actually rented the two bedrooms of our apartment separately, like a rooming house. Obviously, this gave her more control over who lived there than if she just rented the apartment as a whole.

Generally, she wanted to control everything: what flowers we planted, what garden plots we used and what we planted there, how far apart the plants were spaced in the plots. (No French Intensive! I don’t like that crowded look!) Everything. She even had one fruit tree that was hers alone and nobody else could pick fruit from it. Fine, it was her property after all.

I went overseas, traveling for a few months, and my boyfriend and I sublet my room to someone else, so that covered the rent. Told the landlord my plan was to move back, that the subletter knew she only had it for a limited time. My boyfriend was still living there, of course. She approved. Everything was all set.wallpaper_killzone_06_1024

While I was overseas, my landlady, who was a real new-agey type, went to Hawaii, like she does and did her spiritual retreat, like she does. There, God supposedly told her that my time on the land was up. She informed me via email that I was not welcome back. (Seriously, I had always paid my rent. I didn’t get it at all.) There was no official contract or anything, so I had no leg to stand on. My boyfriend was in deep debt and couldn’t afford the expenses of moving. When I got back I had no place to go. What a mess. I found a new place, but we ended up breaking up. Not entirely because of this business, but it definitely contributed. I vowed revenge.

Years later, she was struggling on her mortgage and tried to sell the place. By coincidence, I happened to work for this company whose business it was to warn people that were about to get foreclosed on. She was one of them. I offered her a ridiculously low sum for a multi-million-dollar property, knowing what her deadline was and knowing that unless she got really lucky, she’d have to take it. She took it, and the land was mine. As she drove away, there I stood in the rearview mirror, muttering, “paybacks are a bitch, lady.”

She didn’t crush me totally. She came pretty close, but she didn’t. I still don’t know why she wanted to crush me at all, but she didn’t have that much power over me. And she didn’t know who she was messing with. She slipped up one time and I was there to take advantage. Sure, she had decided to sell the land, but sure as hell didn’t want to sell it to me, and not at that price.

Anyway, the lesson is: it is awfully hard to crush someone TOTALLY. Unless you are at war, literally, you never know if they are going to regain strength and come back and get revenge on you. As long as they are still alive, and still hating you, they can. I really don’t advocate murder, you know. So you could view it this way: DON’T BE A JERK AND MAKE ENEMIES IN THE FIRST PLACE!

(My apologies to law number two, which suggests you should seek enemies so you can re-befriend them. Awfully complicated idea.)

Corporate Espionage Makes the World Go ‘Round (law 14)

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009

James-Bond-007-Photograph-C12149916.jpegIn Greene’s book, the 48 Laws of Power, he states law 14: “Pose as a friend, work as a spy.” He suggests that in polite social encounters, you probe by asking indirect questions that reveal people’s weaknesses and their intentions.

I love to spy. It’s a children’s game that never loses its appeal. And here again, as in so many of the 48 laws we have looked at so far, you have to have a vicious streak. You have to actually dislike the people you are trying to vanquish. You really do. If you like them or sympathize with them at all, you are just doomed. Even with law number 13, which I just objected to so strongly in my last blog, if you really hate the person and want to get revenge on them, then . . . what the hell. Go for it.

What this collection of laws seems to be saying overall is that nice guys finish last. If you care about your friendships and having people like you, then you aren’t likely to be successful. That’s not fair! Everybody wants friends! Okay, so let’s say you crush your enemies, but not your friends. That would be fair. But what if you don’t have any enemies? Law two states that you should actually make some.

Let’s face it, we all have enemies. That landlord that kicked you out, that girlfriend that dumped you, that lady that was rude to you in the checkout line. But the trouble is, do those enemies have anything you want? If you spy on that lady from the checkout line, will you find some wonderful weakness to exploit? Well, probably you will see that her life is utterly pitiful and you’ll feel sorry for her and leave her to her misery. So what’s the point? You have to spy on powerful people, which means you have to make powerful enemies. But who wants powerful enemies? They’ll destroy you! This is all so jumbled up now I can’t make heads or tails of it.boris_natasha

Anyway, such spying, when it’s more than idle chatter at a cocktail party, falls pretty much under the category of corporate espionage. ABC news recently reported on the upsurge of this type of thing. Hewlett Packard planted a spy as a janitor at the Wall Street Journal. He was sniffing out corporate information leakers. Got caught though.

Two competing New Jersey marketing firms were recently featured in USA Today because company A hacked into the email of company B, discovered the discount they were giving a client, then emailed the client with a steeper discount. The guy from company A was caught and marched off the prison, claiming he didn’t even know it was illegal.

The New York Times reports that in France, a hacker screwed this cyclist in the Tour de France by hacking into his drug tests, altering them, and sending them off to the press. He got the guy eliminated!

But the best corporate espionage story I’ve heard occurred in 1811. Francis Cabott Lowell, a very sneaky and smart fellow, went to England and got a tour of a top-notch textile factory. I don’t know if they did these tours on a regular basis, or if as a fellow industrialist he asked for a friendly visit. Maybe he posed as the father of a young lady who was applying for a job thre and wanted to ensure that it was a safe working environment where her sparkling reputation would not be threatened by ne’er-do-wells.

Anyway, during the tour, the proud factory owners showed off their superior, steam-powered mechanical loom. This mechanism was a thing nobody in America had yet been able to figure out. Americans were still sitting around with their old-fashioned spinning wheels, pouting about how much work it was. Well, Lowell memorized the loom, returned to America, and built one. Thus began the American industrial revolution. Of course Lowell isn’t remembered for his dirty trick, he is remembered as a father of the industrial revolution. All’s fair in love and war . . . and corporate espionage.

Speak Softly . . . (law 4)

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

5In my ongoing discussion of the 48 Laws of Power, today I have come to law number four, “always say less than necessary.” This is so hard. Let’s face it, most of the time we never think of the right thing to say at the right time, so when we actually DO think of something outrageously clever and appropriate and oh-so-true to say, we want to say it! And go on and on about it! And really make our point well! And make sure everyone understands! But the fact of the matter is, that just because you know something, doesn’t mean you have to say it. And just because you DON’T say something, that doesn’t mean people won’t hear you loud and clear.

When you are trying to impress people, which for most of us is most of the time, the more you talk, the more ordinary you seem. Even if your insights are wise, it would be wiser to sit there knowing them, alluding to them, offering open-ended statements or questions that allow others to ponder them, than to come right out and state them. Even a totally banal statement can sound original if you make it in a vague, mysterious manner.

The book states, “powerful people impress and intimidate by saying less. The more you say, the more likely you are to say something foolish.” Okay, now here is the other side this law. If you make yourself out to be mysterious, wise, and learned, you better have something to deliver when the time comes due. Creating a mystery-man persona is, in my opinion, the oldest trick in the book. I can’t tell you how many men I’ve dated that thought they were so seductive be answering everything with a question; by never revealing information about their (usually uneventful) pasts; and by acting like they are so deep that they simply can’t communicate all their intense knowledge with words. One fellow gave me a chocolate bar, and when I mentioned that I had been craving one, he claimed to have psychically intuited it. Give me a break, man! Dear reader, If you, whom I don’t know from Adam, knew how often I crave chocolate bars, you could psychically intuit it too. Give me a break. It’s so obvious. I even had one client that I was interviewing in order to assist him with the writing of his memoirs, who would answer all my questions with a question, such as, “Why do YOU think someone would join a cultish religion like mine?” “What do YOU think made me want to open a used car lot?” and “Ah, why did I decide to marry a woman half my age? That’s a very good question. A good question, indeed. Why do you think?” I finally had to tell him that if he didn’t actually answer my questions, the interview was just a waste of his money.

So, there are times to be mysterious, and there are not times to be mysterious. If you cultivate a habit of listening, you will undoubtedly start to talk less. In this case, it is not pretense, nor is it obfuscation. The real reason why those who talk less are respected, is because typically they are the ones who listen more. Now, you can fake it by just talking less, but it won’t get you very far. It’s pretty transparent. But if you try to start by listening more to others, reflecting the things they say in your speech instead holding forth on your own “insights,” it will naturally occur, and then you won’t just be acting wise, you will actually be (gulp) wise.

Make Him Come To You (laws 7, 8)

Tuesday, July 14th, 2009

8My mother always told me, “When you marry, if you want anything from your husband, make it sound like it was his idea.” I never observed her successfully perform this amazing feat, however. She was right about it, for sure, but theory and execution are two different things. In Robert Greene’s The 48 Laws of Power, he offers law number eight in homage to this bit of housewifely wisdom. It reads, “Make other people come to you—use bait if necessary.”
This is a case of 4+5=8. Meaning law four, “always say less than necessary,” and law five, “Build your reputation,” add up to law eight, “Make other people come to you.” Get it? If your reputation is impressive enough, while at the same time, you have not gone out soliciting attention by being a big mouth, people will come to you with hat in hand, so let them.
Let’s say you are hoping a business associate will form a partnership with you on a certain venture, or that you will attract a certain big client. What you want to avoid is asking, suggesting, entreating. When you force the other person to take action to achieve a goal, you are the one in control. When your opponent comes to you, abandoning his or her own plans in the process, you have the upper hand and can dictate the rules of the game.
Your reputation and your various off-handed comments are the bait you use to achieve this. You might just mention that you have expertise in house painting, neuroscience, dog training, or web design (whatever your opponent is seeking), but not go into it very deeply. You might even off-handedly mention your experience in the field: “Oh, I love that color blue, when I worked at Johnson and Johnson labs, all their offices were designed in that shade. But, heck, that was years ago.”
Make the comment and let it pass. Let it nestle into the person’s brain, and when they can’t stand it any longer, they will come to you, asking for your expertise. The art of presenting the bait like this is the aspect of this law that my mom never quite mastered in her quest to plant the seed of an idea in dad’s brain without stating it aloud. But all it takes is this: you see something you like, you smile, indicate that you like it, but don’t suggest that you buy it. Just make it clear that you like it. No pressure to buy. In fact, insist that you not buy it. Spouses typically do want to please one another, so if you spend time indicating the things that you like, chances are, when it comes time for a present exchange, you’ll get what you want. In the same way, business associates can indicate their interest in partnerships, business deals, commercial ventures, and so forth by simply mentioning that interest in conversation, ever so briefly, then moving the subject on to other things.
If your conversation partner is looking for someone to work with, they will know you are available. Your reputation is also a big part of the bait, so you want to be seen as capable and experienced. You also want to be seen as busy! Someone obviously sitting around waiting for work isn’t going to have much of a bargaining chip, even if the other guy comes to you. So remember, in order to fulfill law #8 from the 48 Laws of Power, you have to pay attention to the other laws as well, in particular, #4 “say less than necessary,” and #5 “protect your reputation”.